The United States has once again wielded its trade control stick, this time targeting the global civilian drone market.
On December 22nd local time, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) officially announced that it would add all foreign-made drones and components, including DJI, to its control list, citing "unacceptable risks to U.S. national security." This means that foreign drone companies will no longer be able to obtain FCC approval to sell new products in the United States, effectively closing the market door to them.
However, it is important to note that this ban is not a blanket ban. Older drone models that have already obtained FCC authorization can still be imported, sold, and used normally; existing buyers need not worry about the impact. But in the long run, this undoubtedly cuts off the path for technological iteration for foreign drone companies in the U.S. market.
In response to this decision, DJI quickly issued a statement today (December 23rd), expressing its regret. In its statement, DJI directly pointed out the unreasonableness of the FCC's actions, stating that this ban not only deprives American consumers and business users of their freedom of choice but also undermines the principles of open and fair market competition.
As a pioneer in global civilian drones and aerial photography technology, DJI has clearly demonstrated its value: from empowering creative photographers with innovative tools to deeply cultivating key fields such as agriculture, inspection, surveying, and fire rescue, DJI products have long been a vital support for improving production efficiency and safeguarding lives and public safety, creating irreplaceable value.
Regarding the "security risks" hyped by the US, DJI responded firmly, stating that the safety and reliability of its products have already been verified by the global market and numerous authoritative third-party institutions. Currently, the company is evaluating all feasible paths and firmly safeguarding its own and its global users' legitimate rights and interests.
On one hand, there's trade protectionism under the guise of "national security"; on the other hand, there's a firm response based on strength. Where will this game in the drone industry ultimately lead? Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments section!
